Thursday, February 8, 2018

A Biblical Critique of Keller's "Center Church" (pt. 5)

Keller and Driscoll
Does the Church Have a Social Mandate?

This may sound like a question that should be answered in the third section, dealing with CC’s ecclesiology.  However, it truly belongs here, because Keller’s social mandate seems to be rooted in the doctrine of common grace.  Throughout large portions of the City section (chs. 7-18) of CC, Keller is evaluating positions and approaches to the culture.  He believes that the mission of the church must be balanced between the great commission and the cultural mandate to advance human flourishing.  He says,

We teach Christians to integrate their faith and their work so that they can be culture makers, working for human flourishing—the common good. (47)

numbers do not always equate to influence.  Even if 80 percent of the population of a country are Christian believers, they will have almost no cultural influence if the Christians do no live in cultural centers and work in culture-forging fields such as academia, publishing, media, entertainment, and the arts.  The assumption that society will improve simply by more Christian believers being present is no longer valid.  If you care about having an influence on society, evangelism is not enough. (185)

But effective churches will be so involved in deeds of mercy and justice that outsiders will say, “We cannot do without churches like this.  This church is channeling so much value into our community that if it were to leave the neighborhood, we would have to raise taxes.” (305)[1]

Things like clean water, dental work, changing business, art, music and publishing for the better may certainly be good for humanity in this life. But is this to be the missio Dei (God’s mission) for the church?  As good as these things may be, I’m convinced that this is a terrible distraction from the true mission of the church.  To clearly understand the mission of the church, let’s look at the early chapters of the book of Acts.


After His resurrection, Christ spent 40 days with the disciples, teaching them about the kingdom of God (Acts 1:1-3).  After all the discussion about the kingdom (verse 3), the disciples ask about the presence of the kingdom.  Jesus tells them that the timing of the kingdoms arrival is not for them to know.  Then, He proceeds to tell them that they need to wait in Jerusalem until the promised Holy Spirit comes (1:4-5).  Notice what happens with these two pieces of information in the minds of the disciples:

So when they had come together, they were asking Him, saying, ‘Lord, is it at this time You are restoring the kingdom to Israel?’ He said to them, ‘It is not for you to know times or epochs which the Father has fixed by His own authority; but you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be My witnesses both in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and even to the remotest part of the earth.’ (Acts 1:6-8)

The mandate is about being witnesses, testifying to the resurrection.  The mandate of the church is about testifying to the gospel until He returns (Keller agrees).  The mandate of the church is exclusively about testifying and not about establishing ‘shalom’ or cultural renewal in some sort of kingdom sense (Keller doesn’t agree).  After receiving the commission to witness, the apostles remain undistracted.  Instead of leading the church into cultural renewal, they point to the only One who can restore the creation.  The apostolic message is repent and believe so that Christ can come and reverse the curse placed on this earth.  Peter proclaimed,

Therefore repent and return, so that your sins may be wiped away, in order that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord; and that He may send Jesus, the Christ appointed for you, whom heaven must receive until the period of restoration of all things about which God spoke by the mouth of His holy prophets from ancient time.  (Acts 3:19-21)[2]

Peter preached that cultural renewal was a work of Christ by virtue of His imminent return as King.  Keller, however, believes that our pursuit of cultural renewal, social justice, mercy ministry, and human betterment are based on the fact that Jesus created and redeemed body and spirit:

First, word and deed go together theologically.  The resurrection of Jesus shows us that God not only created both body and spirit, but that he will also redeem both body and spirit.  The salvation Jesus will eventually bring in its fullness will include liberation from all of the effects of sin—not only the spiritual effects but physical and material ones as well.  Jesus himself came both preaching the Word and healing and feeding.  The final kingdom will be one of justice for all.  Christians can faithfully proclaim the gospel through both words and deeds of compassion and justice, serving the material needs of people around us even as we call them to faith in Jesus. (322)

In order to justify the cultural mandate, Keller seems to take passages about the church’s mission to care for the saints and then apply them to the unbelieving poor in society.  On the first page of the book, Keller affirms mercy ministry to the poor as ‘fruit’ because of Romans 15:28.  However, as the previous two verses show, this ministry wasn’t to unbelievers, but instead for “for the poor among the saints in Jerusalem.”  These Gentiles were sharing in their physical possessions for the benefit of Christians they had never met who were undergoing famine conditions.

On page 228, Keller writes that Jesus calls his disciples to renew the culture based on Matthew 5:13.  Yet, in Matthew’s context, being a salty Christian doesn’t earn the world’s favor (as in the case of cultural renewal for the common good), but the world’s animosity because of the offense of righteousness (Matt. 5:10) and Christ (Matt. 5:11-12).  Keller believes the illustration is meat being preserved by salt.  However, Jesus tells us exactly what aspect of salt he is referring to.  Jesus isn’t using salt to talk about preservation any more than melting ice on the road.  He says that Christians are to be salty, and “if the salt has become tasteless” (5:13) then we have a problem.  Christians doing cultural renewal aren’t salty; they taste like philanthropists of all stripes.  Christians walking in righteousness (5:6, 10-12, 19-20) are salty, distinctive in flavor among the world.

In chapter 25, Keller gives a systematic defense of mercy and justice ministries to the community outside the church.  The texts appealed to include the example of Martha serving a meal in Luke 10:40 (323).  Unfortunately for Keller and Martha, Mary was the example to follow and Martha, the example to avoid (Lk. 10:41-42). 

On page 323, Keller appeals to Acts 6:2.  Here the apostles declare that they cannot neglect the Word and prayer, but the needs of the saints must be met as well.  Notice that the needs were among “the disciples” (Acts 6:1).  Specifically, there was some tension between the Hellenistic widows and the Hebrew widows, since the Hellenized widows were being overlooked.  As always, the need was in-house, among the people of God.  The widows here are declared to be “disciples” in verse 1.  In James 1:27, the combination of “orphans and widows” is reminiscent of the OT triad, “orphan, widow, and alien.”  These had no means of provision because they had no husband who was working his inherited portion of the promised land.  Even an alien, a convert from Egypt, Moab, Phoenicia, etc., would be in the same position.  They would only be there because they converted to worship and serve Yahweh, and they we depend on the mercy and care of the fellow faithful Israelites (cf. Deut. 10:18-19; 24:19-22).  Furthermore, Paul defines a widow as a woman who “has fixed her hope on God” and is devoted to prayer (1 Tim. 5:5).  Widows were only to be cared for by the church when they had an established reputation of godliness, a demonstrable faith, and no one in their own household to care for them (vv. 9-16).  Certainly individual Christians will be compassionate towards the lost and must be characterized by good deeds (Gal. 6:10), but I find no biblical evidence for the church’s so-called social mandate. 

Christ didn’t ask us to reverse the curse, set the creation free, or cause times of refreshing.  Only He can do that.  He has asked us to minister to the saints and testify of the resurrection until He returns.  TO BE CONTINUED

Article written by Pastor Jon Anderson.  Jon is a pastor at Grace Immanuel Bible Church and a PhD student at Southern Seminary. His forthcoming dissertation will be on presuppositional hermeneutics.


[1] These are only a few examples.  See also pp. 81, 223-24, 236, 331, 334-35.
[2] Consider Romans 8:18-25 in light of the discussion about the church’s mandate to reverse the curse with social work and doing physical kingdom work.  The earth was subjected to a curse by God Himself.  The Holy Spirit inside of us is a down-payment of the restoration of the created order and the reverse of the curse.  Even in the church-age with the Spirit’s indwelling presence, Paul describes the revelation of the sons of God and setting creation free as an unseen hope for which we eagerly wait.