Jude understood how glorious it is to celebrate our common union in Christ. Magnifying the redemptive grace of God and our undeserved salvation never gets old, does it? Having said that, this emergency 911 epistle (aka Jude), illustrates that it is pastorally negligent to ignore a clear and present danger! To act like everything is spiritually ok, when it's not, is both dangerous and wrong! True shepherds protect the flock at all costs (John 10). On the other hand, when danger appears "hirelings" leave the sheep unprotected. Jesus reminded his disciples that hirelings really only care about themselves. Their personal comfort and well-being is what they are most concerned about. Add to that, Jeremiah 6:14 reminds us that false teachers say, "'Peace, peace!' when there is no peace at all."
After a wonderfully enriching five year journey through the signature Gospel of John, my original plan was to begin a new expository study of a brief, yet power packed, epistle. Philemon. Sadly, I cannot do that at this time. Though the heresy of flown blown Antinomianism has NOT crept into our beloved church family (as was true in Jude's case), hyper-grace sanctification and lower-case “a,” Reformed antinomianism- has! To do nothing and just hope for the best would be a dereliction of duty.
Showing posts with label sovereign grace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sovereign grace. Show all posts
Jul 9, 2024
Confusing and Abusing Grace in the Name of the Gospel. Romans 6:1, 15-18; Jude 3-4 (part 1)
Allow me to illustrate. How would you react if you heard that your city fire station captain responded like this? "Fire station 401. Fire chief Caleb speaking." "Sir, please calm down! So just your attached garage is on fire? Well, we’re really busy waxing our trucks and few guys are catching up on sleep. We had a really busy weekend… Please call us back if the fire spreads to the entire house- bye for now!" You would be outraged...and rightly so!
Nov 17, 2015
The Golden Chain of Salvation
![]() |
| Photo Credit: redeeminggod.com |
“Not long ago I received a call from an editor of a
Christian paper, who receives our Believers Bible Bulletins from a member of
the church here. The editor is a member of a denomination that believes in a
generally Arminian approach to biblical teaching. For example, he does not
accept the doctrine of unconditional election, or election grounded in the
sovereign good pleasure of God, just as we have been expounding it in this
article. Nor does he believe in the perseverance of the saints, or the security
of the believer in Christ. And yet, in spite of this, he occasionally prints
our studies in his paper, apparently thinking that they might do his readers
good, even though free grace is stressed. It was on a Saturday afternoon when
he called me, and I was in our family room without a Bible before me. He
introduced himself over the telephone and explained what he did with the
studies. But he had a bit of a problem, he said. In the study on John 6:34–40,
which he wanted to use in his paper, there were some strong words on sovereign
grace and divine election. He told me that there was one particular paragraph
that, if I did not mind, he would like to eliminate from the study, because it
might be offensive to his readers. It was a paragraph in which I had cited John
Calvin and had added some words myself. I asked him to read the paragraph to
me, which he did, and it had to do with God’s gift of us to His Son. We
discussed it for a few minutes, and then I suggested that it would be
satisfactory to me for him to print the paragraph, but add a footnote to the
effect that he, the editor, did not necessarily endorse all said in the
paragraph. I thought that might satisfy both of us, and he agreed to do that.
But then he added that He believed that those given to the Son would come, as
John 6:37 says, but that there were other things that might be said about it.
“I believe that those given will come to the Son,” he affirmed, but he added,
“but we believe that others might also come, who had not been given.” I said to
him that I did not have a Bible with me and, therefore, would he read John 6:65
over the telephone. And he read, “Therefore said I unto you, that no man can
come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.” And he was wise
enough to put together John 6:37, “All
that the Father giveth me shall come to me,” the sufficient condition for
salvation, the divine giving, with John 6:65, “no man can come unto me, except
it were given unto him of my Father,” the necessary condition for salvation,
the divine giving, and then confess, “Well, that looks like an iron-clad case!”
I said, “Yes, it is.” We must be given to come to Christ, and all of the given
shall come. That is the divine chain of salvation.”
Article by S. Lewis Johnson (1998). Emmaus Journal, 7(2), 210–211
Nov 16, 2015
Three Reasons Christians Should Relish the Doctrine of Unconditional Election.
![]() |
| Photo Credit: http://www.hillside.co/?p=116 |
"The
Purpose of This Gift (The gift of the elect given to the Son
by the Father)
It
demonstrates God’s sovereignty. And we should not pass
on without a word or two concerning the designs of this election. First, God
demonstrates His absolute sovereignty in His act of election. Proud and
arrogant man cannot abide this and regularly objects. Paul in Romans 9:14, 19 offers up man’s
complaints and decisively indicates the divine reply to human rebellion against
the sovereign good pleasure of God. In these verses the apostle lays as the
foundation of God’s counsels about man’s eternal state His sovereign will and
pleasure (cf. vv. 19–23; Job 32:12–13).
The natural man, like the Arminian theologian, likes
to think and say that God loved Jacob, because He foresaw that he would be a
holy wrestler with God and a great believer, and that He hated Esau, because He
foresaw that he would be a profane man, would sell his birthright for a mess of
pottage, grieve his father with an unholy marriage, and seek to slay his
brother, the holy-to-be Jacob. How contrary to Paul’s reasoning in verses ten through
thirteen!
Labels:
election,
Ephesians 1,
John 17,
Romans 9,
sovereign grace,
unconditional election
Nov 15, 2015
Am I One of God's Elect?
![]() |
Photo Credit: www.thewordunleashed.org |
-Matthew Poole
"We are never told to wonder whether we are elect of not: we are instead told to believe in Christ to receive eternal life,
and then we are told that believers
are those chosen in eternity by
God to be given
to His Son.
We know our
election not be peering
in God's inaccessible Book of Life
but by believing in the Lord Jesus
Christ."
- Richard Phillips
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



